This is pretty funny and of course has Tucker Carlson’s “Daily Caller” in a tizzy..
“CBS News affiliate calls 2012 presidential race for Barack Obama weeks ahead of election”
Apparently a local station has already called the 2012 Obama v Romney presidential race for Obama, with 99% of the National Precincts reporting..
No one knows why this was put on the screen.. but the people on the DC now have proof of how Obama and the LSM are going to steal the election..
“This is not funny. This smacks of a FIX IS IN on the part of the mainstream media that Americans aren’t to know about until the night of the election, but someone slipped and gave the game away. An investigation should be conducted and every avenue of detection should get under way immediately, not just for the sake of the candidates, but for the American people ASAP
Says one poster to the site.
You are 100% correct. Just the idea that someone invested the time to key in the data for the graphic to appear on the screen is troubling. Was the person just trying out the option? Were they building the actual view that they planned on showing the night of November 6th? This is really, really disturbing.
Agrees another poster. This “proof” of the conspiracy carries on for awhile, an old friend even makes a reappearance after a pretty long hiatus..
And accepting donations from Chinese and other foreign people, a clear violation of campaign laws, not to mention the self avowed Communists he’s had in his administration (the czar, Van Jones, for instance).
CZARS!!.. yes, Czars.. where have you been these few last years..? I’ve missed ya buddy.
Cripes! Remember that stupid ‘indoctrination’ bullshit… ?
Anyway,the shining star in this mess, is what it all really boils down too..
“No, like the memo went out to all the leftwing media…and all they have to do is repeat it. Oops…out too soon! You KNOW the Dems cheat…this would just be cheating on a spectacular scale, by including the vote counters. Deciding in advance who is going to win. There is no WAY Obama can win legitimately.”
He isn’t the legitimate president now and neither will he be again if his wins..Just ask Steve Wynn, he’ll be damned if he’ll take a lecture from this President! Even Mitt and his “You’ll get your turn” shows just how illegitimate the Right thinks Obama’s claim to the Office of President is. So of course there is going to be cheating on Obama’s part, it’s what the illegitimate do.Not that the Romney’s will give in so easily.. I mean, Tag with money from Mitt and Ann somehow owns a company that, you guessed it, owns voting machines in Ohio, Texas, Oklahoma, Washington and Colorado.
“In other words, a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and his brother, wife and son, have a straight-line financial interest in the voting machines that could decide this fall’s election. These machines cannot be monitored by the public. But they will help decide who “owns” the White House.”
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yes, since Mitt is already cheating, there just isn’t any way Obama can win legitimately..So any win by his, will of course be a set up, just look at that local news election result coverage for the proof.
If you thought you just fell down the rabbit hole and was wondering where the “Drink Me” bottle was, never fear.. the UN will be here to ensure there’s no funny business going on at the polls..
“United Nations-affiliated election monitors from Europe and central Asia will be at polling places around the U.S. looking for voter suppression activities by conservative groups, a concern raised by civil rights groups during a meeting this week. The intervention has drawn criticism from a prominent conservative-leaning group combating election fraud.“
Of course you know what the right-wing has to say about that..
Maybe if we shoot a few of them they might get the point that they aren’t welcome
Yes, that would probably do it.
Anyway, to sum it all up. The fix is in because a local station put up the future election results that they will sneak in on election night, claiming Obama won the election. We know this is really going to happen because the Romney’s are already rigging the vote so if the President does win, it will be through illegitimate means.. making him even less the ‘real’ president than some in the 1% think he already is. But like any third world country exercising what they think is their democratic right, the UN will be placed around the country to ensure there is no funny business going on.
If there’s one thing to be said about US Politics… There’s never a dull moment.
Related articles
- Barrack Obama To Be Declared Winner of 2012 Election with 99% Of Votes Counted (afteramerica.wordpress.com)
- Why You Should Worry That Romney Associates Bought Company That Controls Ohio’s Election Voting (seeingtheforest.com)
- Secret Service Arrests Armed Man for Alleged Obama Threat (abcnews.go.com)
- The Conservative LA Times: “The only thing he (Romney) really stands for is his own election” (politicususa.com)
We Report, You get your tin-foil caps on and decide…
Here is what is wrong with Fox and it’s bat crap-crazy base and why Liberals and their ‘media’ will always be better.
After 9/11 there was a theory floating around that it wasn’t the planes that brought the towers down, but instead it was an inside job hatched out by George Bush,Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. They knew the attack was coming, which is why President Bush was out of the White House and why many others in charge were also out of harms way. They knew the planes wouldn’t be able to do more than burn a few floors but they wanted something spectacular.. a ‘shock and awe’ if you will, so they had a demolition team rig the towers to implode and fall. For proof, 9/11 truthers point to WTC build 7.
The reason behind all this was to give Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld a reason to enact the Patriot Act and other Constitutional rights-ending laws and to take us back to Iraq so President Bush could either finish the job his dad left unfinished, or to get vengeance on the man who tried to kill his daddy. Personally I feel if it was the latter then a secret hit squad would have been used instead, but the former doesn’t make any sense either unless you consider he and his dad had such a crappy relationship that he wanted to ‘best’ his father by actually deposing Saddam and brining freedom to the area. Plausible sure, but the idea that he’d destroy New York city to do it? Crazy.. I know. I’m not saying it’s not crazy. In fact, even in the face of some pretty convincing information, it’s still crazy talk. Sure, some of those question raised should be answered, but the idea that any president would not just allow an attack on the country to take place, but help the death and destruction along to prove he’s better than his daddy is just cuckoo . I’m more willing to say it was to bilk billions out of the governement for war contracts.. but that’s just another part of this crazy conspiracy.
While the Right has it’s ultra-conservative in Ann Coulter (did you just feel that? it felt like a ghost walked over my grave).. the Left has it’s own ultra-wing in Bill Maher. To me, he’s the liberal liberal. I don’t dislike him, in fact I think his show should be a must see for both sides because even though he’s a liberal’s liberal, you can’t deny his facts. Anyway, like Coulter (there’s that ‘ghost walking on my grave; feeling again) Maher has a few ‘fringe’ leanings so to me, this 9/11 truther stuff would be right up his ally and yet..
even he doesn’t buy into the ‘crazy’. It’s not like he was a fan of George Bush, that would be like saying Coulter secretly yearns to have Jeremiah Wright’s love child. No, Maher just knows crazy-talk when he hears it and as a comedian, a ‘social commentator‘ who could discuss the theory in jest while at the same time lending it credibility, Maher doesn’t. But,instead of just ignoring it, he goes after it. When brought onto his show, he even attacks it and tosses it out
That’s right, don’t be gentle with him.. ass-kicking is what’s called for. Why? Because this kind of shit is simply crazy talk that even Bush-bashing, Peta member,Prius driving,arugula eating, ultra liberals find it too insane to put out there. Maher was not the only ultra-liberal, Noam Chomsky and Matt Tiabbi of Rolling Stone also called it crazy. Ok, Taibbi called it clinically insane..but the point is, the liberal world said “whooaa, are you fucking crazy?” to people promoting such an extremist idea. So what does it say when the highest rated, so called ‘News’ network who aren’t invaded by people spreading the crazy, but actually have them on voluntarily, put the crazy out there and say nothing against it?
How did Cavuto respond? Did the “Fair and Balanced” network respond to crazy the same way Bill Maher did and throw it off the set?
That’s right sports fans.. nothing. Not a thing. The idea that any president would allow a catastrophe that will affect generations of American to just happen so that he can get his agenda through is the kind of talk you will only see shut down by the liberal .. what do they call it.. ‘lame stream media’. Conservative media on the other hand,will not only put the crazy out there, but they’ll leave it there unquestioned to fester and spread throughout the masses. Don’t kid yourself, it’s out there and it’s spreading. Today, Poltico.com reported that White House Press secretary ‘gave it to’ Fox news for allowing this crazy on their airwaves, after reading the story and watching the video of Gibbs
I took a gander at the comments..
-If bumbling Bobby screams, it’s not so, then we have to watch FOX because we know it”s true.
-I wouldn’t put anything past this regime.With the elections coming this fall and the possibility of a major loss, everything is on the table and everything is political.
-Whatsa matter Goebbels -I mean Gibbs- does the truth hurt? Obama’s incompetence is stunning. Heckuvajob Obama!
–That’s not so far fetched. Wouldn’t surprise me in the least. Maybe that’s why he got so mad. ‘thou doth protest too much’ This administration is in bed with the environmental wackos who in turn are in bed with eco terrorists. Makes sense to me.
–LMAO … “Baghdad Bob” Gibbs is one of those who unfairly targeted George Bush for the Katrina ‘errors’ that were really the fault of the inept Mayor of N.O and the Democrat Gov. or LA. Sorry about the oil tragedy, but watching Gibbs whine like a stuck pig is another example of, WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND!
yep, Cavuto sure played to his base didn’t he?( Never mind the fact that as a “News” channel, it shouldn’t have a base.) This goes on for 200+ consecutive replies. No rebuttal and no sanity it’s just a giant orgy of crazy hate.
My favorite of course is the “what goes around comes around” argument because that has been the feeling since election night. I’ve said it before, there is a section of the population that thought immediately after learning they had a new President, “Let’s see how you like it”. From that moment on they have stood in opposition of everything, while complaining about things that don’t have any basis in reality. “What goes around!” is the underlying motto behind every single attack against this President. The funny thing is, this President is a lot more “George Bush” than liberals expected and is a lot more passive and conservative than they’d hoped. Had the raving loons at Fox news and those out there living by the “Let’s see how you like it” agenda only argued valid points on policy instead of birth certificates,teleprompters,czars and socialism.. there would have had more liberals in their corner than they’d know what to do with. Instead, the fringe right has taken over the conservative media and the nations attention. It’s not that a majority of the nation believes in what the fringe is spouting, it’s more of a .. you can’t look away from the horror of that car accident.. type problem. But lost in this shuffle are the moderates who by their silence give their consent. Well that’s their problem to work out. John McCain has found a way, and that’s to go back on everything he’s ever done just to prove his purity. Other GOP members are throwing their own personal relationships out the window for proof of purity and party loyalty, and they are to admitting it. Like I said, the bridges they are burning are their own problems to fix when the attention shifts away from the crazy. For now, the ‘tin-foil hats’ have taken over and while you would expect a politician to go whichever way will get him elected, for a so called “News” channel to once again wear theirs proudly, truly is the downfall of journalism. Especially when the only place real people are left to get real news is from the real comedians.
Related articles by Zemanta
1 Comment | tags: 9/11 truther, And I would not be surprised if the White House said, and then we will step in. We will be able to shut down offshore drilling. We will be able to turn to all these alternate fuels, ‘social commentator‘, “Fair and Balanced”, Bill Maher, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, do what? Use this crisis to our advantage. Let this crisis get really bad, FORMER FEMA DIRECTOR on NEIL CAVUTO, Fox News Channel, George Bush, George W. Bush, guess what, John McCain not a maverick, Maher on 9/11 truthers, Maher throws truther out of studio, MICHAEL BROWN, Noam Chomsky, Noam Chomsky and Matt Tiabbi, Patriot Act, Poltico.com story, President, real time Bill Maher., Robert Gibbs, truthers heckle Bill Maher, United States, we might be able to, White House, White House Press secretary Gibbs challenges Fox reporting, WTC build 7, you know | posted in Proper Gander - A Skewed View